Australian Dairy Foods – A dairy brand by any other name

Used under a Creative Commons Licence

Australian Dairy Foods – A dairy brand by any other name…

This is an updated version of an old post, click here to see the original.

Using Names and Places in Dairy Brands: What Australian Law Says

Many Australian dairy brands are built around familiar names and places — think Pauls, Peters, Bega and Bulla. These brands feel local and personal, which is exactly why they work so well on supermarket shelves. But from a legal perspective, using people’s names or geographic names in branding is not as simple as it looks. If a name is already protected as a trade mark, the registered owner will usually have the exclusive right to use it for the same or similar products.

So if a dairy farmer named Peter living in Bulla starts selling “Peter’s Milk” or “Bulla Cream”, they may quickly run into conflict with the owners of existing registrations for Peters and Bulla in connection with dairy products. The core message for dairy producers is straightforward: before you fall in love with a name, you need to understand how Australian trade mark and consumer laws treat names, places and branding in the food sector.

First names and distinctiveness: when “Peter’s Milk” isn’t enough

Under Australian law, a trade mark must be distinctive, not purely descriptive. If a word simply describes the goods — such as “pure milk” for milk — it is very difficult to register, because that would unfairly stop other producers using common descriptive language. A similar principle applies to common first names like John, Mary or Peter: on their own, they are often treated as not distinctive enough for certain goods, because many traders may legitimately want to use their own first names in business.

In practice, “Peter’s Milk” or “Mary’s Ice‑Cream” will often be seen as fairly weak marks unless they are combined with a distinctive logo or other unique elements, or used long enough and prominently enough to acquire distinctive meaning in the market. Over time, heavy use and strong marketing can transform a relatively ordinary first name into a recognisable brand that consumers link to one particular business. At that point, there may be enough evidence of reputation to support registration or enforcement, but it usually does not happen overnight.

Surnames

Surnames raise similar issues. When a trade mark application is examined, one factor considered is how common the surname is in Australia. If a surname appears very frequently on the electoral roll, that can be a sign that the name is not, by itself, distinctive enough for monopoly protection in some categories of goods and services. The policy rationale is that many unrelated people share that surname and should not automatically be blocked from using their own name in honest business.

Some overseas jurisdictions go further and require written consent from the individual whose name is being registered as a trade mark. While Australian law does not adopt that exact rule, it is still important for businesses using personal names to consider how their branding will be viewed in export markets such as the United States or New Zealand, where additional constraints on personal‑name marks may apply. If your dairy or food brand is intended for multiple countries, it is wise to plan your name with those different legal standards in mind.

Place names and dairy brands: Bega, Bulla and beyond

Geographical names are particularly attractive for dairy brands because they evoke local character, provenance and quality. However, place names are also scrutinised closely by trade mark authorities. As a general rule, if your product actually comes from the place in question, registering that place name alone as a trade mark can be difficult, because competitors from the same region also need to be able to describe the origin of their goods.

For example, “Queensland Bananas” would be seen as descriptive of bananas from Queensland and unlikely to be registrable as an exclusive trade mark for one business. By contrast, a name like “North Pole Bananas” is inherently distinctive for bananas, because bananas do not come from the North Pole. In between these extremes are many real‑world dairy brands like Yarra Valley Dairy, Bega or Red Hill Cheese, where owners have been able to build and prove a strong association between the geographic term and their particular goods. In those cases, extensive evidence of advertising, use, sales and industry recognition can persuade the trade mark office that consumers treat the name as a brand, not just a description of where the product comes from.

If you use a place name in your dairy branding, it is critical to keep detailed records: packaging, promotional materials, invoices, media coverage and social media campaigns. These materials can later help demonstrate that the name has come to identify your business in the minds of consumers, which is vital both for registration and for defending the brand against challengers.

Misleading names and “passing off”: when a brand goes too far

Even where a name is technically available to register, it cannot be used in a misleading way. Australian consumer law and the common‑law action of passing off both focus heavily on whether a brand name or get‑up is likely to cause consumers to believe there is a connection with another business or person when there is none.

For example, if a new ice‑cream company tried to launch under the name “Ben & Jerry’s Ice‑Cream” in Australia, it would almost certainly face legal action from the owner of the well‑known BEN & JERRY’S brand, even if the packaging, colours and logo style were different. The problem is not just similarity of words; it is the likelihood that consumers would assume an association with, or endorsement by, the well‑known original brand. The same reasoning applies when a business uses a celebrity chef’s name, or closely echoes a famous dairy or dessert brand, in a way that appears to ride on the existing reputation and goodwill.

Geographical references can also mislead. Labelling a cheese as “Tasmania’s Favourite Cheese” when it is produced in Victoria may create a false impression about its origin, arguably breaching both fair‑trading and labelling requirements. In a sector where provenance and regional character are marketing tools, missteps in this area can have serious consequences.

“First come, first served”: why early trade mark registration matters
Trade marks in Australia are registered on a largely “first come, first served” basis within each class of goods and services. That means if another dairy producer has already registered a particular name for class 29 or 30 goods (common classes for dairy and food products), later entrants may find themselves locked out of that name for similar products.

However, identical marks can legitimately coexist across different industries. For instance, the same word might be registered for apples and chocolates by different owners, or used in both food and industrial goods, where there is little realistic risk of confusion. This is why proper clearance searches and legal advice are so important: the fact that your ideal name is registered does not always make it unavailable, but the context — what goods, what channels, what reputation — needs careful analysis.

Key takeaways for dairy and food businesses

For Australian dairy and food producers, names are more than creative choices; they are legal assets that can unlock or undermine long‑term brand value. Some practical points:

Check first: Before investing in packaging, marketing and domain names, conduct thorough searches to see if your proposed brand is already registered or used in your category.

Think distinctively: Purely descriptive terms and very common names or places are harder to protect. Adding distinctive elements, or choosing more inventive brands, can improve both registrability and strength.

Use and document: If you build a reputation in a name — especially one incorporating a place — keep evidence of use so you can prove that consumers link that name to your business.

Avoid confusion and misrepresentation: Steer clear of names that echo famous brands, personalities or regions in a way that could mislead consumers. Short‑term attention is never worth long‑term legal risk.

With the right strategy, a dairy brand built on a person’s name or a place can be both compelling and legally robust. The key is to treat branding decisions as legal decisions too — and to get tailored advice before your next product leaves the farm or factory.

Please note the above article is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice.

Please email us info@iplegal.com.au if you need legal advice about your brand or another legal matter in this area generally.