What Domain Names steal your trade marks

Help! Someone Registered My Trade Mark as a Domain Name

If you’re reading this, you may have just discovered that someone else has taken your brand’s name as a domain name—or something close enough to cause confusion—and you’re wondering what can be done.

This situation is unfortunately common for brand owners, and it can be both distressing and potentially damaging. Dealing with the loss or infringement of your brand’s online identity isn’t just frustrating; it can feel genuinely heartbreaking, especially if your trade mark is a central pillar of your business reputation and customer trust.

Common Issues Brand Owners Face

When a brand owner registers a trade mark and establishes an online presence, they expect that name to remain uniquely theirs. Unfortunately, cybersquatters and competitors often register domain names that are the same or confusingly similar—hoping to divert your customers, damage your reputation, or even sell the domain back to you at a premium. Here are some examples of “confusingly similar” domain names:

Registering “SharonGivoniConsulting.com” when your registered domain is “SharonGivoni.com.au”.
Modifying the name with small changes, such as “Sharon-Givoni-Consulting.au” or “SharonGivonni.com”—capitalising on typical spelling or typing errors.
Adding industry-specific terms, e.g., “SharonGivoniLaw.com.au” if your trade mark relates to consulting or legal services.

Even small changes to a domain name can confuse your customers and weaken your brand. Similarity isn’t just about exact spelling — how a name looks, sounds, or feels can all lead people to mix you up with someone else. It’s always best to get proper legal advice before deciding what counts as “too close,” because lawyers can assess these things more accurately and help protect your business identity.

Why it’s a problem

Losing your brand’s unique digital identity is more than an inconvenience. It can damage hard-earned goodwill, confuse clients, impact your search engine rankings, and perhaps, worst of all, mean your trade mark is being misused in a way that’s outside your control.
Murals and public installations often raise some of the hardest questions.

The Complex Rules

At Sharon Givoni Consulting, the team regularly helps clients navigate these disputes and understand the processes that apply. There are very specific rules and legal tests used to resolve these matters—whether under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) or the .au Dispute Resolution Policy (auDRP) in Australia.

In simple terms, when there’s a dispute over a domain name, the decision usually comes down to three key questions:

Is the domain the same or confusingly similar to your registered trade mark or business name?
Does the person who registered it have any genuine rights to use it?
Was it registered or used in bad faith, such as to mislead customers or profit from your brand?

These cases are decided by independent panels based on written evidence and arguments. If the panel agrees with the complaint, the domain name can be transferred or cancelled depending on the outcome.

Sharon Givoni Consulting helps businesses protect their online identity by resolving domain name disputes and preventing misuse of digital assets. The firm provides tailored advice on trade mark and domain alignment, dispute resolution under the UDRP and auDRP, and proactive brand monitoring. With years of experience in intellectual property law, the team offers practical, customised solutions rather than generic advice

Laws That Apply—But No Answers

When dealing with these disputes, Sharon Givoni Consulting does not provide blanket solutions or “one size fits all” fixes. Instead, the firm applies complex laws such as:

Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)
The auDRP and UDRP policies
Australian Consumer Law (where misleading and deceptive conduct may arise)
Case law interpreting what counts as “confusingly similar” or “bad faith” registration

Each case is unique, and legal tests are applied to determine eligibility, similarity, legitimate interest, and evidence of bad faith.

The discussion with clients always starts by examining the specifics—your rights, your brand reputation, and the pattern of domain registration.

The “Cityworks.com.au” Case

In 2023, a big reminder came from the Cityworks.com.au case — showing that owning a domain name doesn’t mean you can use it however you like.

The dispute was brought by Azteca Systems, the US tech company behind the CITYWORKS brand, after discovering that an Australian business had registered a matching domain name years earlier.

The panel reviewing the case spotted a pattern that looked suspicious: the domain wasn’t being used for an active business but instead linked to a “for sale” page asking for USD 55,000 and a few ad links that earned clicks.

It was a red flag for “bad faith” use. As the panel put it:

It is your responsibility to determine whether your domain name registration infringes or violates someone else’s rights.

The panel also gave a simple but powerful message:

A quick online search would have shown the existing trade mark — claiming coincidence just doesn’t cut it.

In the end, the domain name was transferred back to Azteca Systems.

Read the decision here: WIPO Case No. DAU2023‑0032

So, even if you think a name sounds common or catchy, copying or closely matching another company’s trade mark can backfire badly.

Always check first — and when in doubt, get legal advice before you register.

You can read the full case on WIPO’s website here:

WIPO Case No. DAU2023-0032 – Cityworks.com.au

SGC not migration When Domain Names Steal your trade marks