Legal Battle of the Bulge

Used under a Creative Commons Licence

Legal Battle of the Bulge

You’ve seen the labels: “guilt-free,” “99% fruit,” “natural,” or “low fat.” They promise a slimmer waistline or a healthier lifestyle—but what happens when these claims aren’t just marketing fluff, but potentially illegal? Welcome to the Legal Battle of the Bulge—where consumer law meets food marketing, and companies can face massive penalties for misleading claims.

This blog explores how terms like “fresh,” “natural,” and “healthy” are regulated under Australian Consumer Law, what happened in the high-profile Heinz toddler snack case, and what food brands need to know to avoid falling foul of the ACCC. Whether you’re running a food business or just trying to decipher what’s on your supermarket shelf, here’s what the law says—and why it matters more than ever.

Case study

Imagine this: you grab a packet of “healthy” toddler snacks from the shelf, believing you’re making a smart choice—only to discover the contents are over 60% sugar. That’s exactly what happened when Heinz was fined $2.25 million for misleading marketing of its “Little Kids Shredz” range. The Federal Court found the packaging implied health benefits with images of fruit and vegetables and claims like “99% fruit and veg”—but the judge said that the conduct was “misleading or deceptive” under Australian Consumer Law. This shows just how seriously the law in Australia enforces truthful representation in the food industry, especially regarding health.

What are the rules?

Under this law, businesses must not make false or misleading claims about their products—this includes packaging, labelling, or advertising. Words like “fresh,” “natural,” or “healthy” can land a company in hot water if they misrepresent the product. Labels must accurately reflect the product’s origin, ingredients, nutritional value, and benefits.

Silence can also be misleading—it’s not just what’s said, but what’s omitted. Think twice about vague marketing that might mislead—for example, an unsubstantiated “natural” claim could suggest a product is minimally processed, even when it’s not.

The ACCC regularly prosecutes cases involving misleading labels—for example: egg distributors falsely claiming “free range,” meat sellers misleadingly suggesting origin stories, and specialty products exaggerating “organic” content.

The case of Heinz is particularly striking given the health stakes for toddlers, and it sends a strong signal that consumer protection law isn’t just window dressing—it’s enforceable, and penalties can be substantial.

Imagine grabbing what seems like a “fresh, natural” snack from the supermarket shelf, only to later learn that the product’s origin, composition, or health claims are misleading or exaggerated. Under Australian Consumer Law, businesses must not mislead consumers through packaging, labelling, or marketing.

Some recent examples show just how far the ACCC will go. In one case, egg sellers faced penalties for advertising products as “free range” or “Fresh‑Range Omega‑3,” when a large proportion of the eggs didn’t meet those standards. Notably, some deli style products came under scrutiny for labelling products like vinegar and ice cream as having a Barossa heritage, even though they were made by third parties in different regions. Fines followed.

These instances highlight a few key points: under Australian Consumer Law , businesses must not make false or misleading claims; silence can be deceptive if it omits relevant details; and vague or exaggerated statements (often labelled “puffery”) may still be problematic if they create false impressions.

The law applies across all communications—including food packaging, online marketing, social media, in-store signage, and branding.

For food businesses—and legal professionals advising them—the risk is high. Ensuring compliance involves clear, accurate labelling; substantiating claims with reliable evidence; using unambiguous language; understanding Country‑of‑Origin Labelling rules; and responding promptly to any compliance concerns.

At Sharon Givoni Consulting, we help businesses navigate this complex terrain. Whether you’re developing new product lines, drafting packaging copy, designing claims like “healthy,” “natural,” “no added sugar,” or managing social media campaigns, we translate the legal requirements into easy, action-oriented guidance.

We also assist with Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) obligations, helping you understand permissible content, ingredient declarations, allergen warnings, and nutrition panels. And if things go sideways, we help you respond effectively—whether through recall statements, corrective labelling, or liaising with regulators.

Our tagline, Turning Legalese into Legal Ease, reflects our approach: practical and compliant.

Please note the above article is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice.

Please email us info@iplegal.com.au if you need legal advice about your brand or another legal matter in this area generally.